Ken Fleet:

My name is Ken Fleet. I am from the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, who are the main sponsors of this tribunal. I'm substituting for our chairman, Ken Coates, who is unable to sit on the jury because of physical illness – he is unable to travel at the moment. But I welcome you here today because I think this is a most important problem that we are going to address over the next two days. In the course of our work over many years, in the foundation we have discovered that the abuse of human rights in the name of psychiatry is widespread and it is confined not to dictatorial countries with tyrannical regimes but in democracies equally and in some cases even more so and we are looking this week end at the treatment of the "mentally ill" or so-called "mentally ill", those who are deemed to be, in the light of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights and particular Article 18 about the freedom of expression. 

I think that we are going to hear much expert testimony this weekend and the main expertise comes from those who have experienced or perhaps have been victims of psychiatric abuse. Much of it, I fear, may be rather harrowing but it must be heard. I have only recently met most of the members of the jury here today and yesterday evening but I am sure that we will all listen very atttentively to the evidence that will be given and that we will take our task in looking at it and judging it very seriously indeed.

We did elect Kate Millett last night as the president of the jury and she will now take over the proceedings. She is well known to most of you, I think, but she will introduce herself and the proceedings of the tribunal from now on. Thank you very much.

Kate Millett:

Thank you very much and thank you to the Russell Tribunal and the Russell Foundation for their sponsorship. We have done something like this before also in Berlin three years ago. We had a Michel Foucault Tribunal, without his help, but relying upon some of the principles of his work and we at that time also investigated the possiblity that psychiatry was in fact in opposition to human rights and had abused human rights on many occasions and this is an investigation we continue today. I think that you have seen that our subject matter questioning psychiatry on the issue of human rights is somewhat of a radical and perhaps a controversial thing to do. Already the Free University has somewhat failed in its commitment which it fulfilled last time, to sponsor this kind of thing to do. We are making a kind of history today in that we are weighing one important branch of medicine and also of social control – weighing it in relationship to the rights of human beings. Has it in fact abridged them, has it gone counter to the notion of human freedom, which is in the United Nations for example. 

The accusation today will be brought by two gentlemen, George Alexander and Dr. Thomas Szasz, who's work you probably already know. He has I think been the first and bravest and foremost voice in the world to question psychiatry's scientific basis and its ethical one as well. They will begin the charge and formulate the questions that we present to psychiatry.